A couple months ago I was looking
at a half finished stuffed animal, a 3/4's finished bracelet, and
multiple half read books. I was thinking about how I have a gazillion
hobbies and I don't feel particularly skilled at any of them. I also
often felt sort of restless with them. I'd wonder if I should finish
up a book and then think, “no, but I was going to take that online
Spanish class” and I'd end up feeling or being rather inert. Like I
sort of know how to sew, and I can kind of make my own jewelry, and
sometimes I'm decent at drawing depending on how much I practice, and
I know a couple cords on the guitar, and like 50 phrases in ASL, etc.
Then I became curious to see if anyone else has noticed this about
themselves. I Googled something like “too many hobbies” and of
course the internet was happy to tell me that yes, indeedly-do there
are a lot of people out there who are wondering how they ended up
with so many extracurriculars and what it meant to have a lot of half
finished projects in your life.
Most
of the posts I read landed in one of two camps. The first and most
dominant camp are those who believe that it's fine to have a million
interests/hobbies and you should just let yourself do whatever you
feel with them. After all, it's your free time, why feel it necessary
to limit yourself? As one writer stated: “Try not to get hung up on
completing things as the end goal of a particular hobby or
interest...it's not a fun hobby anymore if you're only doing
something just to get it over with. Sometimes having a bunch of
half-finished projects lying around can be a bit of a source of
guilt, but again...this stuff we do in our spare time is supposed to
fun and fulfilling...” (link
here). A lot of people in this camp hold one woman, Barbara Sher,
as their champion. She wrote a book, “Refuse to Choose!” in which
she discusses this very concept. She argues that rather than a
problem, having this wide variety of interests and hobbies is really
a gift and that those with this “problem” are actually unique,
creative individuals. The most appealing conclusions I found coming
from these writers is the notion of just enjoying the process of
whatever you're doing and not focusing on the end result. This
“journey not the destination” argument is compelling. I hold
beliefs around the importance of process over end results, for sure.
But I think there's a lot to be learned and gained from sticking
through a process when it stops being all rainbows and butterflies. I
think there's a way to still be process focused but also finish
something. I get that it's my free time and the notion that I should
enjoy doing whatever hobby I've chosen but there's going to be
aspects I don't like about every hobby I choose. I love the act of
sewing, I hate the cutting part. I love drawing, I dislike choosing
what to draw. I guess my point is that the boring, infuriating,
tedious, complicated parts of whatever activity I pick up are also
part of the process or journey and I'm missing a huge chunk of
learning if I bail on a project when I start to feel something
unpleasant. I don't think that means I'm necessarily attached to the
end result, but that I'm staying open to all aspects of the process
at hand.
The
other camp, which I really didn't find too many people in, posited
that this sort of activity jumping is a kind of laziness, or at least
is not a quality people should cultivate in themselves. This camp's
notions seemed best detailed in an article from 2008 in Cabinet
magazine. Daniel Rosenberg wrote a piece entitled “The
Young and the Restless”. He discusses a children's book from
1818 where a boy is able to do whatever activities he wants instead
of going to school to prove to his parents that he can learn more
about the world on his own. He ends up in complete disaster with
nothing done. Rosenberg uses this book to discuss the term “sloth”
and how it used to have more than one meaning. “Historically, sloth
is a bipolar concept, signifying a kind of dissatisfaction that may
be expressed equally through immobility or restlessness. And it was
precisely to capture this ambivalence that the term was first adopted
in Latin”. He spends a fair bit of time discussing the etymology of
“sloth” and then discussing the book some more. He doesn't offer
any solutions to this problem but the notion that this sort of
restless activity jumping was a form of sloth really resonated with
me. I definitely found myself in this camp.
I
made a list of all the activities I wanted to do or liked to do
currently. (Here's a picture of my brainstorm next to a weirdly
doodled heart).
I decided I would conduct an experiment for myself to
see if I felt more fulfilled and less restless with my free time,
i.e. my time not at work, if I narrowed my focus for a few months. If
on Saturday morning I found myself with a whole day of unstructured
time ahead of me, I could pick from any of the few activities on my
short list and do those as much or as little as I wanted. It was hard
for me to think about crossing something off the list at first as it
felt uncomfortable and limiting to narrow my scope. I decided I would
pick 3 hobbies/activities plus reading and these would be my focus
for 3 months. I figured that reading always be in the mix but decided
to pick a topic or area that I'd be reading about for this time
frame. So I landed on: sewing, drawing, and restorative justice
tasks/activities. Part of my thought process was that by choosing
just a few hobbies I could become more expert, or at least more
skilled, in them. For instance, I've sewn a lot of projects but
they've been very haphazard and I'm lacking a working knowledge of
how to do some pretty simple, basic sewing techniques. Even things
like cleaning my machine are sort of a mystery. I decided I would
work through projects in a couple of the sewing books I have, even if
I don't find the projects particularly exciting, I would go through
them so that I could gain the basic skills I tried to leap frog with
my sewing adventures in the past. For drawing, I decided I could work
on any drawing projects I liked but if I felt like drawing and didn't
know what to draw I would pick from a list here.
I already had a lot of plans with some restorative justice groups in
Rochester so it seemed like RJ had to be on the list as it was
already taking up a lot of my spare time. For
reading I decided I'd focus on classic literature first. There's a
surprising number of classic lit books that I've never read and I've
often thought about getting through some, but never do. I almost
always opt for newer novels.
I
made this plan in the beginning of March so it's been about two
months now. I think all in all the 3 month time frame is too short.
Maybe something like 6 months before switching hobbies would be
better. I'm not sure yet, I'm going to reassess at the end of May.
The
sewing hobby has gone well and by that I mean, I feel as though I'm
becoming more skilled at it and I'm finding it more fulfilling. I've
completed a number of projects that were more fun and turned out
better than I was expecting. Two of my favorites are a Star Wars
apron I made for my step-mom and a comic book themed clutch:
Drawing
has taken a back seat – I really haven't worked on it too much. I
don't really have much of a feeling about this other than maybe it
makes more sense to just pick two hobbies. I'll ponder this more at
the end of May.
I haven't been thinking about RJ stuff as a hobby although it's probably
taken up most of my free time during the week. I'm working on several
transition circle cases at Monroe Correctional Facility and am now
part of a working group planning for trainings on restorative
practices for life time inmates at Attica. I have wondered during
this time if I should have made my reading material choice focused on
restorative practices, but I think this would have left me feeling
like it was too much of one thing. I've also already done a huge
amount of reading on this topic as it was a main focus of mine in
graduate school.
The
classic lit activity is going well, albeit slowly. I'm finishing up
Crime and Punishment at the moment, which I've found both
exasperating and enjoyable. I'll be reading the Great Gatsby next.
Again, I'm wondering if 3 months is too short of a time frame. Also,
I didn't really have an end goal here – like how many classic lit
books did I want to have read? I guess I didn't pick an end goal
because I didn't care, I figured I'd just keep at it until the three
months were up. I've also found that I really didn't stick to my
original plan with reading, unlike the other activities. I've read a
lot of other books during this time that were not classic lit and I
think most of them have been on my phone. I'm fine with this. I
wasn't particularly concerned with narrowing my reading scope, more
like spending time accomplishing some reading goals that I put off
for some reason. I don't know if I ever would have read Crime and
Punishment if I hadn't made this plan and I'm quite glad to have read
it (almost).
Overall,
I do think this has been a helpful or useful experiment for me so
far. I feel less restless with spare time, more focused, more
fulfilled, more mindful of what I'm doing. Of course, some of this
could also be because I'm meditating way more but I think I'm
enjoying this more planful approach to my activities.